Harris is a firm believer in
self-interpretation and analysis and approaching a story from a unique angle.
This approach to writing makes forwarding and countering much easier and much
more effective and useful, and also makes for a better piece of literature all
around. This form of approaching writing is more difficult because you cannot
fall back on the ideas or information previously gathered by other people, but
it allows for a greater impact made on the audience. The approach that is more
common is following what others have written and providing a counter or
agreement with the referenced works. This makes the process of getting
information out to an audience much easier and faster because not as much
though is required to go into it.
The
New York Times has a collection of articles that are both ideal and not in
terms of Harris’s view. Many articles that the New York Times has published
have been independent from most other big media posts because they are less
biased and influenced by internal and external sources. They maintained a very
centralized forwarding process throughout the presidential debate. They did not
just attack Romney and they did not just praise Obama. They provided as close
to a balanced progress of journalism as you could find in a big news
organization. Although they do stick with the main crowd with many topics of
discussion, that is not an issue because they are still a business and they
still have to provide hundreds of articles a week. Overall, the New York Times
does an excellent job in their approach to writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment